Home ›
Wrestling › Hello, Jim Ross.
Do you think WWE should actively recognize the varying importance/success of WWE Hall of Fame inductees? For example, they could be divided into 'First Ballot' Hall of Famers and 'Revered Alumni', or an idea to that effect. And also, they could continue to recognize who were the "Celebrity" inductees. This way, it would mean more for someone such as Shawn Michaels to be inducted as a First Ballot Hall of Famer; rather than simply a Hall of Famer, which is shared by people with far less success within the professional wrestling industry.
Again, thank-you for answering any of my questions which you do.
Hello, Jim Ross.
Do you think WWE should actively recognize the varying importance/success of WWE Hall of Fame inductees? For example, they could be divided into 'First Ballot' Hall of Famers and 'Revered Alumni', or an idea to that effect. And also, they could continue to recognize who were the "Celebrity" inductees. This way, it would mean more for someone such as Shawn Michaels to be inducted as a First Ballot Hall of Famer; rather than simply a Hall of Famer, which is shared by people with far less success within the professional wrestling industry.
Again, thank-you for answering any of my questions which you do.
Posted: Mon, 11/09/2009 - 1:39pm in
J.R.'s Answer:
I think that most fans care about the WWE HOF and I also feel that it is an untapped brand within WWE that could mean much more than it currently does.